Why Trust Us

    Most people chasing a missing parcel don't fail because they can't write an email. They fail because they follow the wrong process. That's the problem we exist to solve.

    The real reason delivery disputes fail

    Over and over, we see three mistakes turn winnable cases into lost refunds:

    1. Contacting the wrong counterparty

    People chase the courier first. The courier tells them to contact the retailer. By the time they do, they've lost goodwill, time, and sometimes a statutory deadline. Under UK consumer law, your contract is with the retailer, who is liable until the parcel is in your hands. Starting anywhere else is starting behind.

    2. Weak or disorganised evidence

    A screenshot here, a forwarded email there, no dates, no reference numbers, no tracking link. Retailers reject claims that look messy because messy claims are easy to dismiss. The case you present determines the reply you get.

    3. Poor escalation: too early or too late

    Some people threaten chargebacks in their first email and get dismissed as difficult. Others wait months and miss their bank's deadline entirely. Escalation is a sequence, not a panic button. Doing it in the wrong order usually kills the claim.

    A template alone fixes none of this.

    Why a template isn't enough

    You can get a template from ChatGPT, a Reddit thread, or a Which? guide in thirty seconds. They are all roughly the same. And they all assume you already know:

    • who to send it to
    • when to send it
    • what evidence to attach
    • what a good response looks like
    • what a stalling response looks like
    • when the next step is chasing, and when it's escalating
    • whether chargeback or Section 75 applies to you
    • when the clock runs out

    Most people don't know those things, because they've never had to. So the template gets sent to the wrong party, at the wrong time, without the right evidence, and the claim dies quietly.

    We don't just generate a template. We guide the full process.

    How our system fixes this

    We built getparcelrefund.com as three connected layers, not a text generator.

    A decision engine, not a chatbot

    Our core is a rule-based decision engine built on UK consumer-rights logic (Consumer Rights Act 2015, Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and established chargeback rules). You describe your situation. The engine determines liability, the correct counterparty, and the right first step.

    Deterministic. Reviewable. Consistent. Not a chatbot guessing its way through your case.

    A structured workflow

    Every case follows a clear sequence: diagnose, contact the right party, present evidence, wait the correct period, interpret the reply, escalate or close. You always know which step you're on and what the next one is. No endless back-and-forth. No "try this and see."

    Escalation timing that matches the law

    We tell you when to escalate, not just how. Chargeback windows. Section 75 thresholds. Deadlock letters. Ombudsman eligibility. Each one has a specific trigger and a specific deadline, and we surface them at the right moment in your case, not in a generic FAQ.

    Why this beats the alternatives

    If you use...What you getWhat's missing
    ChatGPTA plausible-sounding emailProcess, liability logic, timing, evidence strategy
    Reddit / forumsAnecdotes from strangersAccuracy, consistency, your case's specifics
    Generic templatesA documentDirection on who to send it to and when
    getparcelrefund.comA complete, case-specific action planNothing

    Templates are a commodity. Process is the product.

    Grounded in UK consumer rights

    Our guidance maps to the laws that actually govern your claim:

    • Consumer Rights Act 2015: retailer liability until delivery.
    • Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013: delivery terms and cancellation.
    • Section 75, Consumer Credit Act 1974: credit card joint liability (£100 to £30,000).
    • Chargeback scheme rules: Visa, Mastercard, Amex timelines.
    • Financial Ombudsman Service eligibility: when and how to escalate a bank's decision.

    We quote the right provisions in the right places, so your emails land with weight, and so the retailer's compliance team recognises a claim they need to process correctly.

    Who built this

    getparcelrefund.com is built and operated by BiteRight Ltd (Cyprus), a team of:

    • Tech entrepreneurs with a background in building consumer-facing products that make complex processes simple.
    • Legal and consumer-rights specialists who translate UK consumer law into rules a normal person can follow.
    • Operations people who've handled thousands of real retailer and courier disputes and know what actually moves them.

    We built this because we got tired of watching friends and family lose refunds they were legally owed, not because they were wrong, but because they did the right thing in the wrong order.

    What we promise, and what we don't

    We promise:

    • An honest read of your case, including when it's weak.
    • A clear, step-by-step process grounded in UK law.
    • Neutral, factual wording in every message we draft for you.
    • No contact with retailers or couriers on your behalf. No inbox access. No impersonation.
    • No selling your data.

    We don't promise:

    • A guaranteed refund. Nobody credible can.
    • That every retailer will behave reasonably. Some won't.
    • A shortcut past the process. The process is the shortcut.

    The bottom line

    If your parcel is missing, you don't need another email template. You need to know who to contact, in what order, with what evidence, and when to escalate.

    That's what we do. That's all we do. And we do it using deterministic rules, UK consumer law, and a workflow built from real cases, not guesswork.

    Questions: info@getparcelrefund.com